Comments on: SocialAdr v2.0 Released http://blog.socialadr.com/functionality-changes/socialadr-v2-0-released/2009-12-09/ ...the latest news, features, and status updates Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:32:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ben http://blog.socialadr.com/functionality-changes/socialadr-v2-0-released/2009-12-09/comment-page-1/#comment-32 Ben Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:30:10 +0000 http://blog.socialadr.com/?p=120#comment-32 Sure. The setup is similar to the way the Good and Awesome accounts worked before, in that the full functionality of the site is available at every level. The major differences between the account types are in the ratio of shares given to shares received (higher account types get more shares in return), as well as in the maximum links per month. There are also some minor difference still like max number of times your link can be shared, etc. We'll be putting a page up soon with full details on each account type. Sure. The setup is similar to the way the Good and Awesome accounts worked before, in that the full functionality of the site is available at every level. The major differences between the account types are in the ratio of shares given to shares received (higher account types get more shares in return), as well as in the maximum links per month. There are also some minor difference still like max number of times your link can be shared, etc.

We’ll be putting a page up soon with full details on each account type.

]]> By: sitesmy http://blog.socialadr.com/functionality-changes/socialadr-v2-0-released/2009-12-09/comment-page-1/#comment-31 sitesmy Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:09:05 +0000 http://blog.socialadr.com/?p=120#comment-31 Can you explain please about account differences (Link Builder, Link Addict, Linkaholic)? Thanks Can you explain please about account differences (Link Builder, Link Addict, Linkaholic)?
Thanks

]]> By: Ben http://blog.socialadr.com/functionality-changes/socialadr-v2-0-released/2009-12-09/comment-page-1/#comment-30 Ben Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:34:42 +0000 http://blog.socialadr.com/?p=120#comment-30 Thanks for the props Colin, and the suggestion. We've actually talked over the idea of adding spinning, and I think it's definitely something we want to get added. I can't give you an exact time frame for when that will happen; we still have a couple of questions to answer around how it would work (do we want all our users to need to learn 'spyntax', for instance) plus we need to get it slotted in priority-wise with the rest of the stuff we're working on. Keep the ideas coming! Thanks for the props Colin, and the suggestion. We’ve actually talked over the idea of adding spinning, and I think it’s definitely something we want to get added. I can’t give you an exact time frame for when that will happen; we still have a couple of questions to answer around how it would work (do we want all our users to need to learn ‘spyntax’, for instance) plus we need to get it slotted in priority-wise with the rest of the stuff we’re working on.

Keep the ideas coming!

]]> By: Colin http://blog.socialadr.com/functionality-changes/socialadr-v2-0-released/2009-12-09/comment-page-1/#comment-29 Colin Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:37:13 +0000 http://blog.socialadr.com/?p=120#comment-29 Hi Kane & Ben, really nice set of enhancements - great work guys. I would also love to see the ability to spin your site title and description so they do not all apear the same in the bookmark engins. Any chance of seeing that sometime soon? Hi Kane & Ben, really nice set of enhancements – great work guys. I would also love to see the ability to spin your site title and description so they do not all apear the same in the bookmark engins. Any chance of seeing that sometime soon?

]]> By: Kane http://blog.socialadr.com/functionality-changes/socialadr-v2-0-released/2009-12-09/comment-page-1/#comment-28 Kane Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:49:46 +0000 http://blog.socialadr.com/?p=120#comment-28 We'll give it some thought, thanks for the suggestion Neil. We’ll give it some thought, thanks for the suggestion Neil.

]]> By: Neil http://blog.socialadr.com/functionality-changes/socialadr-v2-0-released/2009-12-09/comment-page-1/#comment-27 Neil Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:52:59 +0000 http://blog.socialadr.com/?p=120#comment-27 Ah ok that makes sense now, thanks for explaining. So is there a simple way of making this clearer, I'm guessing many new members will think exactly the same thing. Ah ok that makes sense now, thanks for explaining.

So is there a simple way of making this clearer, I’m guessing many new members will think exactly the same thing.

]]> By: Kane http://blog.socialadr.com/functionality-changes/socialadr-v2-0-released/2009-12-09/comment-page-1/#comment-26 Kane Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:14:00 +0000 http://blog.socialadr.com/?p=120#comment-26 @ Neil - Heh, you're not the first person to say that! I think people may get the impression that they've already shared certain pages because many members bookmark similar-type pages multiple times. For some of these niche sites, they may have 5 pages bookmarked all on the same topic. So after a while they all start looking the same ;) But to answer your question, yes the Share Queue should only be displaying bookmarks that you have not yet shared. @ Neil -

Heh, you’re not the first person to say that! I think people may get the impression that they’ve already shared certain pages because many members bookmark similar-type pages multiple times. For some of these niche sites, they may have 5 pages bookmarked all on the same topic. So after a while they all start looking the same ;)

But to answer your question, yes the Share Queue should only be displaying bookmarks that you have not yet shared.

]]> By: Neil http://blog.socialadr.com/functionality-changes/socialadr-v2-0-released/2009-12-09/comment-page-1/#comment-25 Neil Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:03:04 +0000 http://blog.socialadr.com/?p=120#comment-25 Ben, it all looks mighty impressive and some excellent new features. But can I ask a question that might be just me being a little thick ! The share queue is supposed to be new bookmarks that are available for me to share right ? But without checking my history I'm sure I have shared the majority in there already. I don't want to keep bookmarking the same stuff as my accounts would be flagged? I feel I might be missing something very basic here ?? Shouldn't the share queue be limited to new web pages that I have never shared before ? Ben, it all looks mighty impressive and some excellent new features. But can I ask a question that might be just me being a little thick !

The share queue is supposed to be new bookmarks that are available for me to share right ? But without checking my history I’m sure I have shared the majority in there already. I don’t want to keep bookmarking the same stuff as my accounts would be flagged? I feel I might be missing something very basic here ?? Shouldn’t the share queue be limited to new web pages that I have never shared before ?

]]>